Computational Model Library

Open Peer Review Model (1.0.0)

This is an agent-based model of a population of scientists alternatively authoring or reviewing manuscripts submitted to a scholarly journal for peer review. Peer-review evaluation can be either ‘confidential’, i.e. the identity of authors and reviewers is not disclosed, or ‘open’, i.e. authors’ identity is disclosed to reviewers. The quality of the submitted manuscripts vary according to their authors’ resources, which vary according to the number of publications. Reviewers can assess the assigned manuscript’s quality either reliably of unreliably according to varying behavioural assumptions, i.e. direct/indirect reciprocation of past outcome as authors, or deference towards higher-status authors.

Release Notes

First release

Associated Publications

Open Peer Review Model 1.0.0

Submitted by Federico Bianchi Published May 24, 2021 Last modified May 24, 2021
sociology of science peer review evaluation quality science

This is an agent-based model of a population of scientists alternatively authoring or reviewing manuscripts submitted to a scholarly journal for peer review. Peer-review evaluation can be either ‘confidential’, i.e. the identity of authors and reviewers is not disclosed, or ‘open’, i.e. authors’ identity is disclosed to reviewers. The quality of the submitted manuscripts vary according to their authors’ resources, which vary according to the number of publications. Reviewers can assess the assigned manuscript’s quality either reliably of unreliably according to varying behavioural assumptions, i.e. direct/indirect reciprocation of past outcome as authors, or deference towards higher-status authors.

Release Notes

First release

Cite this Model

Federico Bianchi (2021, May 24). “Open Peer Review Model” (Version 1.0.0). CoMSES Computational Model Library. Retrieved from: https://www.comses.net/codebases/3d99eb9f-ae4f-42d0-8c58-9d28757161c0/releases/1.0.0/

References

Squazzoni, F., & Gandelli, C. 2012. Saint Matthew strikes again: An agent-based model of peer review and the scientific community structure. Journal of Informetrics, 6(2): 265–275. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2011.12.005

Squazzoni, F., & Gandelli, C. 2012. Opening the black-box of peer review: An agent-based model of scientist behaviour. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 16(2): 3. doi: 10.18564/jasss.2128

Create an Open Code Badge that links to this model more info

This model has not been reviewed by CoMSES Net and should be independently reviewed to meet the Open Code Badge guidelines.
You can use the following HTML or Markdown code to create an Open Code Badge that links to version 1.0.0 of this computational model. 

<a href="https://www.comses.net/codebases/3d99eb9f-ae4f-42d0-8c58-9d28757161c0/releases/1.0.0/">
  <img height="100" src="https://www.comses.net/static/images/icons/open-code-badge.svg" alt="Open Code Badge">
</a>


[![Open Code Badge](https://www.comses.net/static/images/icons/open-code-badge.svg)](https://www.comses.net/codebases/3d99eb9f-ae4f-42d0-8c58-9d28757161c0/releases/1.0.0/)
Contributors
Federico Bianchi
DOI
No assigned DOI
Model Version
1.0.0
License
CC-BY-SA-4.0
Programming Language
NetLogo
Software Framework
NetLogo
Operating System
Operating System Independent
Publish Date
Monday, May 24, 2021
Last Updated
Monday, May 24, 2021
Downloads 50
Peer Review
Peer review in process
Version Submitter First published Last modified Status
1.0.0 Federico Bianchi Mon May 24 16:54:39 2021 Mon May 24 16:54:39 2021 Published

Discussion

This website uses cookies and Google Analytics to help us track user engagement and improve our site. If you'd like to know more information about what data we collect and why, please see our data privacy policy. If you continue to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies.
Accept