Computational Model Library

Inquisitiveness in ad hoc teams (1.0.0)

The model has two types of agents: decision makers and problems. Decision makers move in the environment to form teams to solve problems. While problems are only characterized by difficulty levels, decision makers have knowledge (competence) they can use. They can also team up to create a task force oriented toward solving a given problem. The way knowledge is assembled in the team depends on whether one of its members shows what we call ‘inquisitiveness’. This is the disposition to use enquiry to explore and understand information coming from social channels (i.e., other team members). The model assumes that highly inquisitive individuals assemble information in a non-linear fashion, hence increasing the chances to find original solutions that are not just the sum of team members’ competences. Instead, non inquisitive individuals have a linear approach to team problem solving. This simulation explores when and if inquisitiveness brings something to the team and to the system (an organization?) as a whole.

Screen_Shot_2015-10-18_at_4.31.09_PM.png

Release Notes

This version of the model is slightly different from the one used in the paper. The original model caused NetLogo to produce a number that was too large to compute. This problem did not affect the data but it was just annoying to deal with when running the model ‘qualitatively’ so to say (i.e., performing random runs to check how parameters work). The modified lines of code are identified in the file.

Associated Publications

Bardone, E. & Secchi, D. 2017. Inquisitiveness: Distributing rational thinking. Team Performance Management 23(1/2): 66-81.

This release is out-of-date. The latest version is 1.0.1

Inquisitiveness in ad hoc teams 1.0.0

The model has two types of agents: decision makers and problems. Decision makers move in the environment to form teams to solve problems. While problems are only characterized by difficulty levels, decision makers have knowledge (competence) they can use. They can also team up to create a task force oriented toward solving a given problem. The way knowledge is assembled in the team depends on whether one of its members shows what we call ‘inquisitiveness’. This is the disposition to use enquiry to explore and understand information coming from social channels (i.e., other team members). The model assumes that highly inquisitive individuals assemble information in a non-linear fashion, hence increasing the chances to find original solutions that are not just the sum of team members’ competences. Instead, non inquisitive individuals have a linear approach to team problem solving. This simulation explores when and if inquisitiveness brings something to the team and to the system (an organization?) as a whole.

Release Notes

This version of the model is slightly different from the one used in the paper. The original model caused NetLogo to produce a number that was too large to compute. This problem did not affect the data but it was just annoying to deal with when running the model ‘qualitatively’ so to say (i.e., performing random runs to check how parameters work). The modified lines of code are identified in the file.

Version Submitter First published Last modified Status
1.0.1 Davide Secchi Thu Jun 11 19:53:09 2020 Thu Jun 11 19:53:09 2020 Published
1.0.0 Davide Secchi Wed Aug 8 06:42:25 2018 Thu Jun 11 04:11:03 2020 Published

Discussion

This website uses cookies and Google Analytics to help us track user engagement and improve our site. If you'd like to know more information about what data we collect and why, please see our data privacy policy. If you continue to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies.
Accept